Blog

US Restaurant Direct Order vs Third-Party Margin Playbook (2026)

A 2026 U.S. playbook to compare direct online orders vs third-party delivery using real contribution math, not guesswork.

Published Feb 14, 2026
direct orderingthird-party deliveryrestaurant margindoordashuber eatsusa
On this page

Third-party apps can fill slow shifts. They can also turn your best-seller into a weak-margin order.

Direct ordering can fix that, but only if you price and track it correctly.

Quick Take

  • Major U.S. marketplace programs still publish tiered commission structures that can materially change margin by channel.
  • Direct channels usually carry lower fee drag but require consistent repeat-order flow to win.
  • The right strategy is often hybrid: acquire on marketplaces, retain on direct channels.
  • You need channel-level contribution math, not one blended “delivery margin.”

The Mistake That Keeps Operators Stuck

Many teams compare channels by top-line sales only. That hides the real question:

Which channel leaves more dollars after all channel-specific costs?

In owner communities, this is a recurring theme: high delivery volume with weak cash outcomes.

Channel Contribution Formula

Use this by channel:

Contribution dollars per order =
Net collected
- food cost
- packaging
- channel labor
- channel-specific fees
- promo funding

Track per-order contribution first. Then track contribution per labor hour.

Worked Example (Same $32 Menu Ticket)

Assumptions:

  • Food + packaging + channel labor: $14.20
  • Third-party effective deductions: 28%
  • Direct channel effective deductions: 6.5% (processing + basic direct channel tech stack)
  • Direct retention spend allocated per order: $1.40

Third-party

Net collected = 32 x (1 - 0.28) = $23.04
Contribution = 23.04 - 14.20 = $8.84

Direct

Net collected = 32 x (1 - 0.065) = $29.92
Contribution = 29.92 - 14.20 - 1.40 = $14.32

Same dish, same kitchen, very different contribution.

Practical 2026 Mix Strategy

1) Use marketplaces for discovery

Let third-party channels surface your brand to new guests. Treat part of commission as acquisition cost.

2) Protect repeat margin on direct

Build direct re-order behavior with:

  • easier repeat UX
  • pickup-first offers
  • controlled loyalty offers

3) Keep rules compliant

Do not run tactics that violate platform terms. Use permitted channels and transparent guest communication.

What to Track Weekly

  • orders and average check by channel
  • contribution dollars by channel
  • repeat rate by channel
  • promo spend by channel
  • cancellation/refund rate by channel

If a channel grows orders but contribution stays flat, you are buying sales with margin.

30-Day Test Plan

  1. Baseline current channel economics.
  2. Set target mix and target contribution dollars.
  3. Launch one direct-offer test (pickup bundle or reorder incentive).
  4. Re-measure weekly.
  5. Keep what increases contribution dollars, not just order count.

KitchenCost helps you compare channel-level contribution with live recipe costs so channel mix decisions are based on margin, not guesses.

Sources (checked on 2026-02-14)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is direct ordering always more profitable than third-party apps?

Not automatically. Direct channels usually have lower fee rates, but you still need to account for acquisition, payment, and fulfillment costs.

Should I stop using third-party platforms?

Most small operators should not. Third-party platforms can be effective acquisition channels, while direct ordering protects repeat-order margin.

What metric should I compare across channels?

Compare contribution dollars per order, then review repeat rate and acquisition cost by channel.

How quickly can I test a channel mix change?

A 30-day test is enough for most independent restaurants if you track ticket size, contribution dollars, and repeat behavior weekly.

Try it free — calculate your first recipe cost

Enter your ingredient prices and get recipe costs, margins, and selling prices instantly.